|
If one
takes the time to look around the country and investigate the myriad of
wildlife and fisheries management controversies in all states, one should get
deeply concerned. To the casual and uninformed the heated debates appear
to be nothing more than business as usual. Wildlife resource management
always was and always will be, controversial.
However,
close examination reveals we may have actually transcended a new era.
You've read the stories. Ban all trapping in Maine
and Minnesota because of a possible incidental
take of an endangered Canada
lynx. Ban all bear hunting in New
Jersey because the Governor hates hunting. Ban
all bear hunting in Florida because Florida bear are a newly
discovered subspecies. Stop all trout stocking in California because trout are predators and
may impact the frog population. Poison out rainbow and brown trout
because they are invasive species. Kill the deer in New
York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Missouri because they
are destroying forest regeneration. (I may have missed a few
states) State and federal experts are always on hand to tell us predators
have no impact on wildlife populations. Really? The national press
and their continuous condemnation of Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska for culling their wolves fill the
news doldrums. In New York
coyote season actually closes so coyotes can give birth and raise their
young. Huh?
Out West as
in Alaska and Canada, it is the wolf programs
that are destroying our wildlife, our hunting and our ranching industry.
Those western state wildlife agencies supported by the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (or maybe controlled would be a better word) argue vehemently (except Wyoming) that wolves are
beneficial as elk, deer, wild sheep, livestock and pet dogs and cats rapidly
disappear. These are just a few examples of the madness; I could go on
and on.
Behind each
of these stories and controversies we hear voices proclaiming that we must
follow the path of science and science says we must go down this road. It
is extremely difficult for some not to conclude that all of this is really the
Wildlands Project unfolding right before our eyes. Others have said war
has been declared on our rural residents and their way of life. And still
others conclude the origins of these agendas are the International Association
of Game and Fish Agencies and even the United Nations. That conclusion
will have eyes rolling and you will be branded a conspiracy theorist for
certain
In reality the origins of the anti-hunting and anti-fishing agendas over the
past ten years really don't matter. They are real and they are
happening. What is new is our state wildlife agencies are running out of
money. Their programs have decimated sportsmen retention and
recruitment. The traditional "customer" of these state agencies is
realizing hunted species and his and her voices have been completely removed
from table and the environmental voice has usurped their interests. In
desperation the state agencies have appealed to their legislators for general
tax fund financing, which has fallen on totally deaf ears. Legislators
don't want wildlife management as another line item within state budgets
subject to economic down-turns and stimulus packages.
On the
upside all the nonsense may be drawing to a conclusion. State wildlife
agencies are now being forced to make a choice. They can rebuild their
bridges with our sporting community or they can bank on the environmentalists
getting them general tax fund revenue. Our national economic crisis will
probably force the agencies to see the light, sooner rather than later.
I hate to be
the bearer of bad news, but wildlife management as we once knew it is
dead. We are currently in an era of total political management. It
is not about science, it is about politics. The truth is politics now
controls the science. Yours truly has hosted and produced one thousand
radio interviews in the last thirteen years. I believe I have a handle on
this one. Ironically, after one hundred years of financing the total
recovery of our game and non-game species across this nation, our sportsmen are
being pushed aside as an insignificant voice in the discussion of
management. So, the next time you go to battle with your state
agency over a management issue, don't waste your time arguing science.
Wildlife
management across this country has evolved into anything, but science.
Jim
Slinsky is the host and producer of the "Outdoor Talk Network", a nationally
syndicated, outdoor-talk radio program. For a station near you or to contact
Jim, visit his website at www.outdoortalknetwork.com
|