As another severe critic of the Wildlife Department for their disgraceful inequities and mismanagement of our deer herds and wildlife, I personally and wholeheartedly endorse and support your crusade, efforts, and allegations that are directed at and pertain to Molini and the unscrupulous conduct and lack of good judgement practiced and demonstrated by the present adamant staff. The department, in my estimation, demonstrated by conduct now has developed into a big and powerful political bureaucracy with the blessings of the politically appointed commission members who are actually at the mercy of the biologically indoctrinated wildlife department staff. What qualifications do these politically appointed individuals have in order to discuss, disagree, or ability to make corrections and recommendations to be followed responsibly?

My opinion is that wildlife commissioners are not much different from the jurors that serve on a grand jury investigation. These individuals' names are drawn out of a contained list of individuals off the streets, so to speak. Like any attorney or commissioner, what chance and wildlife knowledge do they have to serve them against an educated staff of biologists. These are professionals with a well prepared barrage of answers using all of their biological scientific terminology to intimidate and embarrass such individuals with limited educations. This is the biggest reason they manage to end up getting their way. They have all the answers and explanations for the commissioners to sit there and just listen, while they receive their biology lesson for the day. Most politicians (Wildlife commissioners) lack the experience and wildlife knowledge to criticize and refute these experts at their own game. I would welcome the opportunity to serve on one of these juries.